Having a Plan about Your Plan

In the VC industry, experienced investors often claim that ideas themselves are worthless without proper execution. The same is true for the stock market. Having a well thought out equity selection approach is a necessary, but insufficient condition for achieving consistent profitability. Finding new trading ideas is not enough. There is no purpose of having four-five stocks in your watch list if you don’t have a clear plan how to profit from them.

When are you going to enter: on a breakout or in anticipation? Can you afford to watch the stock in real time and do you have the emotional capability to enter when it breaks out? I like to enter in an anticipation of a breakout.

How much are you going to risk? Where are you going to put your stop? I like to enter my stop at the market order immediately after I open a trade. If I am stopped, I accept that as part of the game. I was either early or wrong about the direction. Mental stops don’t work with me as sometimes I can’t watch my stocks in real time or if I am watching, I might decide to give it a bit more room and lose more. I just know myself. Barring another flash crash, this works beautifully for me. It might work for you too.

Where are you going to exit and why?

– My position is automatically closed when my stop is hit, no questions asked;

– I will automatically sell 1/2 when the achieved gain is 3 times the risked amount; I will trail the rest;

– If my stock doesn’t move in the next 2-3 days after I entered, I sell. I have no intention to be in stocks that don’t perform.

Seth Godin on Social Leverage

Self sufficiency appears to be a worthy goal, but it’s now impossible if you want to actually get anything done.

All our productivity, leverage and insight comes from being part of a community, not apart from it.

The goal, I think, is to figure out how to become more dependent, not less.

Career Risk – Herding – Momentum

Jeremy Grantham’s latest newsletter is out and as always is well worth the read. He is a value investor, but he comprehends the inherent structure of the stock market to a level, where he clearly understands why and how the momentum phenomena works. Institutional money managers manage first and foremost their career risk and then their clients’ risk, which results in very little originality on Wall Street and essentially herding. Herding is the foundation behind momentum. There is nothing wrong to be part of the herd as long as you have well thought out, disciplined exit strategy. Herding is not uniquely human. It can be noticed in almost all living species on Earth. It is ingrained in our brains as a basic approach for survival.

Remember, when it comes to the workings of the market, Keynes really got it. Career risk drives the institutional world. Basically, everyone behaves as if their job description is “keep it.” Keynes explains perfectly how to keep your job: never, ever be wrong on your own. You can be wrong in company; that’s okay.

Keynes had it right: “A sound banker, alas, is not one who foresees danger and avoids it, but one who, when he is ruined, is ruined in a conventional and orthodox way along with his fellows, so that no one can really blame him.” So, what you have to do is look around and see what the other guy is doing and, if you want to be successful, just beat him to the draw. Be quicker and slicker. And if everyone is looking at everybody else to see what’s going on to minimize their career risk, then we are going to have herding. We are all going to surge in one direction, and then we are all going to surge in the other direction. We are going to generate substantial momentum, which is measurable in every financial asset class, and has been so forever. Sometimes the periodicity of the momentum shifts, but it’s always there.