LinkedIn and the Implications of Buying on the IPO Day
- Posted by Ivanhoff
- on May 19th, 2011
The success of the $LNKD IPO has just changed the exit strategy for all social media companies that are still private. The combination of small float and being the first U.S. based direct play of the social media trend produced wonders.
If you are a short-term trader, it does not matter if you use the service or if you understand it. All it matters is the volatility and the huge range that hot IPOs typically provide. $LNKD provided multiple opportunities for intraday traders and you didn’t have to buy blindly at the open to profit, on both the long and the short side. The stock built several high-probability intra-day bases with clear stop levels.
For swing-traders and investors, historically it hasn’t been a good idea to buy on the first day of the IPO. Most stocks perform poorly in the first six months after their IPO as underwriters and early buyers sell to lock in profits and mitigate risk. Even some of the biggest stock market winners in the past 7 years, struggled in the first few weeks after their IPO. Then they formed a base and broke out to a new high. You don’t have to chase by buying on the first day. Wait for the stock to establish clear zone of support and resistance; wait for it to prove itself by making a new high.
Take a look at the after IPO price action of $GOOG, $CMG and $OPEN.
No matter the story behind the IPO, it is never enough to sustain a long-term trend. A company needs to deliver a number of consecutive catalysts to sustain the expectations and fuel the price growth. At least this was the case with many of the biggest stock market winners – $GOOG, $CMG, $OPEN.
At the end of the day, catalysts drive stock prices. For the different time frames, different catalysts matter. Short-term price trends are fueled by momentum, medium-term price trends are fed by earnings related catalysts, long-term price trends are sustained by social and business trends. When it comes to a day to day price action, valuation is irrelevant. Traders don’t care about valuation. They just care about risk to reward and momentum.
The information in this blog post represents my own opinions and does not contain a recommendation for any particular security or investment. I or my affiliates may hold positions or other interests in securities mentioned in the Blog, please see my Disclaimer page for my full disclaimer.
blog comments powered by Disqus-
My name is Ivan Hoff. I am a stock trader. I manage Stocktwits 50, Stocktwits Email and was featured in The Stocktwits Edge, which I edited. (More) -
Recent Posts
- 10 Insights I Learned from Benjamin Graham
- House of Mirrors
- 10 Insights from Abnormal Returns – The Book
- Market Games
- Market Noise or Why Recency Bias Hurt Us
- The Spike In Gold Is Not a Good Sign for the Stock Market
- There Is a Difference Between Knowing and Doing
- 10 Ways to Make Sense Out of the Market Insanity
- The Sleep Index Has Not Been Sleeping
- The Most Important Stock Market Leading Indicator Today
-
Archives
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- June 2008
-




